I like sweet things. I like candy bars. I like ice cream. I like . . . sweets. So, here are a few cookbooks, which again came in the mail. which focus on sweet things. Not savory. Sweet. (Ok, I like savory too and am trying to undo my addiction to sweets. At least reduce it?) and today, I am substituting reading about sweets for eating them. The books are: Cutie Pies by Dani Cone; So Sweet! from Sur la Table; and Sugar Sugar: Every Recipe Has a Story from Kimberly "Momma" Reiner and Jenna Sanz-Agero. All are Andrews McMeel books (among my faves in the free to bibliochef pile of books -- and this despite my love for the murder mysteries form elsewhere).The first two are of the smallish, cutsesey pie variant, which I have to admit do not do much for me. I think they are meant to be presents we buy others. And the second is a genre (ok, not a genre; just a physical object type I prefer) I like better -- a hefty weighty tome -- and I love the cover -- which seems to feature a (maybe chcolate?) buffalo on top of a cookie. Hmmm.
More substantively?
Dani Cone seems to be a Seattle person, who has opened both coffee joints and, more importantly, places that emphasize . . . pies. Her coffee places have the perfect name: Fuel. And her pie places (she has multiple locations) are called High 5 Pie. Each features a sort of retro feel (at least on line!) . . . The cookbook Cutie Pies does as well. Subtitled "40 sweet, savory, and adorable recipes," the book does verge a tad on adorable for me. Having said that, the recipes appear under the guises of multiple pie shapes that High 5 Pues features, including cuite pies (cooked in muffin tins), petie-5s (cooked in mini-muffin tins), piejars (you guessed it -- cooked in a mason jar), flip sides (aka turnovers), pie pops (you guessed it again. . . pie lollipops), and . . . odly enough, full sized pies. (All described on p. xiii of the book.) The two most interesting options, from this reader's point of view are pear, gruyere, prosciutto petit-5s (yep, they look a little like those tiny quiches one sees on buffets. Still, I'd eat a load of these if you made them for me) and pear-cranberry-ginger cutie pies. Is it pear time? Apparently so.
Perhaps most crucially for me, there is a section on making pie crust, it claims to teach you how to be inventive, and . . . it teaches you how to make pie crust. And not just graham cracker crusts, which are the only kinds I have ever successfully made. So: are you a pie maker? Want this book? Ask me.
So Sweet from Sur la Table is similarly tiny and cute but not authored by an entreprenurial individual but part of an industry. What does it have in common with Cutie Pies besides Andrews McMeel and its size? Both are connected to Seattle, which is where Sur la Table also originated.This is one of their many cookbooks, and its subtitle says "cookies, cupcakes, whoopie pies, and more." My question: when did whoopie pies return? Did I miss that? I purchased one recently (which went uneaten) from (gasp) Starbucks. Who knew? Cupcakes I knew were fashionable. And even those french macaroon cookies. But whoopie pies?
Finally, my preferred text for today: Sugar, Sugar by Kimberly "Momma" Reiner (of Momma Reiner's Fudge fame) and Jenna Sanz-Agero. Together they are apparently the "sugar mommas" -- and this quite literally as both are proud mothers. And they feel free to tell you and seem to think we care. Anyway, I may like this best among this pile of free books because I remember the Archies and a song of this title. (Click here for the lyrics and/or to send the tune to your cellphone as a ring tone.) The book has nothing to do with that, but I am still trying for the title of queen of the non sequitur. And besides, they manage to steer at least a little sround the cutesy version of sweet because of the buffalo on their cover. I like it. Turns out this is all about a recipe "submitted by Irene Mangum from Dorothy Cassidy Gayden's recipe from East Felciana Parish, Louisiana -- page 136 of the book -- called "buffalo chip cookies. They come complete with a story of their origins.
One thing I like about this book is that there are lined segments of hte book for notes. On the one hand, this makes the book longer and heftier. On the other hand, not sure why I owuld pay for notepaper attached into the book (which is sort of what this really is). Usually I just write right on to the page. Also, there are, alongside many of the margins (usually the right side of the right page. Hmmm. Anyone said right handeed cooks here?), sugar mommas tips. I never heard of "carpool crunch" -- which seems to mean your time has run away from you into carpooling everyone's lkids around including yours (hey -- others are busy too, even those sans children) -- and are thus time saving options. All too often the labor saving suggestions involve getting kids to do things. Hmmm. Ok, lots of the recipes are fun, the stories are fun, but really, how much of a push for more and more babies can there be? I love it that their are floating islands in this book -- one of my favorite dessert I get when I am being spoiled (or we have company). Not so sure that anything called "chocolate hydrogen bombs" is really politically correct. (despite the fact they might taste great.)
This one I will hold on to for a while. You never know. Besides, I bet they never even heard of the Archies. Have you? If not, click here for wikipedia's take or here for a pretty awful youtube version of Sugar and Spice. (Careful -- is your audio on?) or, go traditional and try here for their hit, Sugar Sugar. Yep, non sequitur queen.
For an interview with Dani Cone, click here. For additional reviews of Sugar, Sugar, click here (especially if you want to see a truly silly dog picture) or here (if you're secretly into what publisher's weekly thinks) or here for a sort of random blogosphere view. Wanna know their book tour schedule? Click here.